The USFA Zip 22 – What Happened to the Revolution?

10223
6
Share:

I love the weird, the odd, and the fun, especially if its cheap. When the ZIP 22 premiered initially, I thought it was the perfect combination of funny, strange, and fun. At the time it seemed to be a promising gun. The company making the weapon was USFA, a firearms company known for their high-end Colt SAA clones. USFA made great guns, and while the Zip was outside their wheelhouse the gun itself seemed promising.

Zip 22

The Zip in all its space age design.

It was a bullpup 22 LR handgun that utilized Ruger 10/22 magazines. Its odd box shape design was eye-catching, and the design was something no one had ever really done before.

It would be endlessly customizable with the ability to add a variety of enhancements. This included different sights, an adapter to attach the Zip to a Picatinny rail, plans for an SBR conversion and more. You can toss on a threaded barrel for a suppressor, a single shot 22 Magnum conversion, and even a plate to accept Glock factory sights over the stock Zip sights. It seemed like the sky was the limit. The best part was it was all supposed to be incredibly affordable. The platform promised to be modular, and the owner of USFA put his full weight behind the ZIP 22.

Humble Origins

The first showing of the Zip was in a video that seemed to be aimed at going viral. A video intentionally made to drum up interest in the design. The video labeled Unidentified Firing Object was 38 seconds long and was uploaded to Youtube on June 4th, 2012. It was the only video on an account owned by a John Smith.

The video garnered 13,841 views as of this writing and did find its way to the Firearm’s blog. Here we saw a “Doug” commenting on the post, and a “Doug” apparently emailed the link to TFB. Doug Donnelly was the owner of USFA.

He commented a rather long post that reeks of marketing talk. It’s archived at TFB and a worthy read in the history of the Zip 22.

So what happened?

I was an early adopter and bought the first one I could. Unfortunately, it never got through an entire magazine without a failure. Different fixes were released, but the magic was gone, and I eventually traded the Zip away without much thought. I wasn’t the only one. A cursory glance at Youtube showed tons of problematic Zip guns. Issues with failures to feed, eject, and more were prevalent. There were even more reports that the Zip gun would fire out of battery, creating a hazardous situation.

If you Want Malfunctions… You Got ’em.

Other common complaints included the placement of the charging handle and a restrike rod that put hand dangerously close to the end of the barrel. The awkward way to hold the gun, and how BX 25 magazines wouldn’t work without the Zip magazine upgrade.

Poorly Placed Charging Handle?

Remember when I said the owner put his full weight behind the Zip? Well, he put his weight behind it. USFA was a successful company producing American made Colt clones that were revered. The owner of USFA decided to sell off all of his machinery and tooling for building those Colt clones to fund the production of the USFA Zip.

Hmm, what is happening here?

In the process, the company went under and went under hard. The Zip never really ran right. Some users got them working with the right ammo and right magazines and the upgraded spring kits, but the majority were left holding a futuristic looking paperweight complete with plenty of frustration. This lead to the Zip factory shuttering its door and closing its website.

A Tiny Ejection Port…

Revisiting The Zip 22

Imagine my shock when I discovered a new in box Zip 22 sitting on the shelf of my favorite gun store. Well, it was sitting in the back, unsold and the owner of the gun store said he couldn’t sell it in good conscience. I asked him how much he wanted, and assured him I knew what I was getting.

Lots and lots of malfunctions.

We shook hands on fifty bucks, and I left with what has to be the last brand new USFA Zip in the country. That’s easy to say because there was likely less than a thousand ever produced. I like to make the joke in 20 years I’ll have a substantial investment, and it’ll be worth a hundred bucks.

I got home, lubed it up tossed in a BX 25 and went to my backdoor range. The gun performed precisely as I remembered it. Meaning it didn’t perform at all. I actually couldn’t get past a single round without some issue.

Lots of failures to ignite, failures to eject, or extract and a handful of double feeds. The gun comes with two springs, and the ‘target’ spring is installed from the factory. I was shooting Federal Automatch, which is supposed to be high velocity and rated for automatic guns.

Sad Face.

I swapped out the target spring for the high-velocity spring and tried again. Still no real success. Then I swapped ammo to some CCI stingers I had in the old ammo can. I didn’t get much of a change outside of firing three rounds in a row one time.

The Problem?

The main problem is the fact the bolt moves faster than the magazine can feed the weapon. This is just one problem, and the most common. USFA offered a magazine upgrade kit, but I’ve never actually seen one in the wild. Failures to eject are another issue which seems to be caused by too small of an ejection port.

22 handguns, in particular, tend to be very finicky, and designing one so unique seemed to be a problem waiting to happen.

What Went Right

The gun was an abject failure, and clearly, it deserved to be. However, did the gun do anything right? I like to think so. I find the weapon to be way more accurate than it has any right to be. Especially when you consider the crap sights. Also, the gun was cheap, with an MSRP of $199 and a standard price of $175.00. I guess you do get what you pay for.

Ergonomics? Ain’t nobody got time for that.

USFA was very enthusiastic about the gun and did live up to its modular promise. They released a wide variety of different components right off the bat. This included the rail adapter, the various sights, a scope rail, a glow in the dark top rail, and more. The SBR stock was never released, or at least I can’t find any evidence of it being sold or produced.

If Only It Worked.

If the gun worked, you could make a very fun braced pistol, but unfortunately, this never came to be. USFA tried hard to push the gun and wanted to make it the modular platform they promised. I do wish more companies would approach the release of their weapons with the same enthusiasm and the same amount of accessories and support as the Zip 22.

Unfortunately trying hard doesn’t always result in success. USFA is no more, and the Zip 22 is gone. It’s a remarkable end to an outstanding company.

  • Eric

    WD40 , soak it down and it’ll run like a champ.

    • The Destroyer

      The only time you use WD40 on a firearm is in an emergency situation… WD40 is horrible for guns…

      • BraveNewWhirled

        Feinstein is worse.

  • john shirley

    I saw the Zip at Media Day at Shot in early 2013. Interesting premise and price, but I also disliked the funky ergos and constant malfs.

    • The Destroyer

      I think I could deal with the ergonomics, but I refuse to own an unreliable firearm, even if it is meant for “range only” use.

  • The Destroyer

    I very nearly bought one of these… Glad I didn’t waste the money! I’m thinking of buying a virgin 10/22 receiver and building a scaled down version of the Ruger 10/22 Charger. I’m sure it will be much more reliable, though a “bit” bigger.