Is the Beretta APX RDO a Better Glock?

7210
8
Share:
Beretta APX RDO

The Beretta APX pistol was designed as the company’s potential entry into the Army Modular Handgun System trials. Knowing that the M9 family was ready for replacement after the past several decades of service, the company veered away from their traditional double-action / single-action preference.

What?

The striker-fired Beretta APX is the company’s entry into the polymer duty pistol market. True to previous designs like the PX4 family, Beretta chose to combine function and modern design, ending up with a futuristic look that supports ergonomic goals. You’ll notice the slide first. Sans traditional cocking serrations, the APX features vertical ridges, spaced about a half-inch apart to accomplish the same purpose. They extend the full length of the slide, so there are no “front” or “rear” cocking serrations. I find the approach effective.

The trigger is very good for a duty gun. Measured from the center of the leaf, this one breaks at 4 ¾ pounds. There is no stacking or hint that it’s going to break, so it truly does have a “surprise break” if you care about such things. The reset is crisp, and you can easily feel and hear it.

The APX family uses quality steel magazines with witness holes just like earlier models.

The APX family uses quality steel magazines with witness holes just like earlier models.

Capacity is robust, with 17+1 for the 9mm version shown here and the APX RDO ships with two steel magazines equipped with witness holes. The APX has other expected featured like three different sized backstraps and ambidextrous slide lock and magazine release.

So what?

The RDO model is designed for optics use, although a cover plate is standard in case you don’t want to use one. The slide is cut to accept one of four included mounting plates to fit a variety of pistol red dot optics like the Trijicon RMR shown here. The company also includes a variety of mounting screws in different lengths to fit different optics. The sights are standard height, so out of the box, you won’t be able to co-witness the irons sights through an optic. However, the APX factory three-dot sights are installed via dovetails, so they are easy enough to replace.

The RDO model comes with four mounting plates to fit a variety of red dot sights, like this Trijicon RMR.

The RDO model comes with four mounting plates to fit a variety of red dot sights, like this Trijicon RMR.

The other less prominent feature of the APX is that it’s a modular system. The serialized fire control system is removable from the frame so, in theory, you can swap that into different frame types and pair it with different barrels and slides. This isn’t an instant “drop-in” process – I think it was intended to be used at an agency or unit level by armorers responsible for maintaining and configuring lots of guns.

To close with the obligatory comparison to a Glock, and at great risk of starting a fan boi war, I like it better than say, a Glock 17. The ergonomics are far better as is the trigger. I didn’t have my protractor handy, but the grip angle seems very close to identical, so it would be an easy transition.

Tom McHale is a committed learning junkie always seeking a new subject victim. As a lifelong student of whatever grabs his attention on any particular day, he thrives on beating rabbit trails into submission. In between his time as a high-tech marketing executive, restaurant owner, and hamster cosmetology practitioner, he’s published seven books and nearly 1,500 articles about guns, shooting, and the American way.

  • Doak Carswell

    I have never cared for Beretta handguns, and have no intentions of ever buying one. The only weapon they make that I find appealing, is the new semi-auto tactical shotgun. JMHO

    • Jim Biasella

      You are missing out on quality firearms

      • Doak Carswell

        I have shot quite a few of them over the years, I just don’t like their feel and their triggers. As an aside, I have never liked DA/SA handguns anyway. The department I used to work for went to the S&W 45acp DA/SA when we switched from wheel guns to pistols. I also was required to carry a S&W 9MM DA/SA when I was assigned to the detective division. I shot expert with both of them, but still despised them.

        • Aardvark

          My understanding from the article is that this is a departure from their usual DA/SA design. Might be worth a try.

    • Brian Mooney

      Wow. Well that’s quite an evaluation, Doak. A little shy on details as to “why.” With all due respect, sir, I think you are dismissing a new, and quite different gun based upon past and quite different experiences -that’s called basing your your opinion on upon petulant “past predjudices.” I am no fan either of several of the most popular of recent Beretta handguns, such as that foisted upon our military by our incredibly antiquated and narrow-minded selection processes (a process that defies the imagination). But that alone does not define Beretta forever, as the world’s oldest, continuously-in-production gun maker. I can’t wait to see and try one.

      Why can’t you accept that Beretta might have done some different here, something you might actually -God forbid- like? What’s wrong with keeping an open mind?

      • Doak Carswell

        It’s very simple Brian, It is just my choice not to. Great to be an adult and make MY own decisions. YMMV.

        • Tattootommy45

          Exactly

    • Tattootommy45

      Agreed brother. Beretta isn’t for me either. My Smith and Wesson M&P .40 Cal does the job for me