My Quest: Find a Budget Worthy LPVO Setup

I searched, Googled, and jumped between multiple websites to find the right setup. I got frustrated quickly. I’m spoiled by being able to buy a red dot or prism with an integral mount and hit the “Buy It Now” button. I’d find an optic I liked, but I couldn’t find a mount I wanted, and when I did, it blew my budget.

Then, I crept over to Swampfox. I’ve tested, used, and reviewed optics from Swampfox a good bit. I’ve tried their prisms and red dots, and they pulled off both genres well. How about their LPVOs? Not only did they have LPVOs, but they also had mounts, backup mounts, and backup red dots. I fired an email off, and Swmapfox sent me a complete LPVO setup consisting of the Warhorse 1-6x LPVO, a Hostile Engagement Mount, and a Swampfox Liberty red dot.

After spending a little time at the workbench with a vise, torque wrench, and level, I had my Colt EPR decked out and equipped with a complete LPVO setup. Before we get to the range performance bit, let’s break the setup down a bit.

The Warhorse 1-6X – The Star of the Show

In a world where 1-8x, 1-10x, and 1-12x LPVOs exist, I still like the 1-6x setups. I see the LPVO as an exceptional tool at 300 yards and capable of reaching up to 500 yards, but with a lack of parallax correction and a small objective lens, it’s not a long-range optic regardless of the top level of magnification.

The Warhorse 1-6x is a first focal plane option that retails for less than $700. It’s designed to be the premier LPVO of the Swampfox lineup. The setup comes with either a BDC-style reticle or a MIL reticle. There is also an option for MIL or MOA turrets, but I went with the MIL model.

The optic has a 34mm tube, weighs 23.37 ounces, is 10.08 inches long, and has a 24mm objective lens. It’s a hefty optic, but it’s a well-made design. I can’t find any basic faults in its construction, and it comes with a push/pull elevation turret and a capped windage turret.

The illuminated reticle features 12 different illumination settings, with an off position between each setting. It consists of a large, illuminated three-quarter circle with a dot in the center. To the sides, we have crosshairs that steer your eyes toward the illuminated portions. Underneath, we have an MOA BDC or MIL ladder for ballistic drop and windage.

It sounds busy, but it’s not. When magnification is maximized, everything becomes big and easy to use. When you drop it to 1x, the reticle becomes a small set of crosshairs with some illumination. LPVOs are supposed to be versatile, and the reticle represents versatility.

The Hostile Engagement Mount

Swampfox offered a 34mm option with their Hostile Engagement mount, and I jumped on it. One thing I have learned about LPVOs and AR-height mounts is to go big. Lightweight mounts are great, but they do break easily unless you spend a small fortune.

Even then, some high-end companies have had issues with lightweight mounts. I’ll eat the weight if it ensures reliability. (I guess I am an average Trijicon user…)

The Hostile Engagement is a big beefy mount that’s plenty strong. It uses T25 Torzx bolts and integrated recoil lugs to keep it in place. The mount weighs 8.25 ounces, bringing me two pounds of optics and mounts. It pushes the optic to a 1.6-inch centerline for easy use with any AR-type rifle or weapon with an inline stock.

The rings also have an RMR footprint, so you can mount a backup optic directly to the optic’s mount, eliminating the need for an offset optic mount.

The Swampfox Justice 2

If I have a mount for an offset red dot, I might as well add one. The Justice 2 is big for a micro red dot. It’s perfectly suited as a minimalist rifle optic or a backup red dot. I used the multi-reticle version. I want one of the big ring reticles.

It’s an offset optic for close-range engagements, so I want a big, easy-to-see reticle that might be forgiving if I don’t have a great cheek weld.

The optic has shake-awake tech, four reticles, big adjustment buttons, and a 50,000-hour battery life. It’s not revolutionary but well-suited for the offset dot role.

Putting It All Together

With the setup mounted, I proceeded to zero the optics. I zeroed in on the Warhorse first. I used a simple 50/200 zero and confirmed at 200 yards. It’s mostly on the money at 200 yards with M855 bulk ammo. I zeroed the Justice 2 at 20 yards. Within 20 yards or closer, the red dot is accurate enough to put lead into something quickly and efficiently.

Both optics provide great adjustments. We get tactile and audible feedback. The Warhorse proves to be dead on MIL adjustments per click. The turrets are very easy to adjust but secure. The Justice 2 requires a small take, and the adjustments are a broad 1 MOA per click, but that’s not a problem with a dot like this. I’m not looking to measure groups at 100 yards.

With everything zeroed, I had some fun with the setup. I ran a drill that involved me shooting a playing card at 25 yards, transitioning to the red dot, and hitting an IPSC target also at 25 yards. It’s a blast to switch gears from a fairly slow, precise shot on a small target to laying lead on a big, close target as fast as possible.

Doing that slight twist to move from Warhorse to Justice is always fun. It proved the setup worked well in tandem.

Going Fast

I remained up close and played with some basic drills with the Justice 2. I hit a Bill Drill, a Failure to Stop, and a string of double taps across three targets. It’s odd not to have a cheek weld, but while it was a new experience, it was easy to adapt.

I settled on the big segmented circle reticle. It’s easy to use, and I can fill my target with the dot and let lose with confidence, knowing the shots will be in that circle from 15 to 35 yards. If anything comes closer, we will have some offset. If there is anything further, we’ll switch to the LPVO anyway.

The Warhorse has the same problems as any LPVO. It wants to be red dot fast but just can’t do it. The eye box and eye relief are both modern and relatively generous, but they are still more restrictive than red dots. They are not outstanding but good, especially for the money.

The reticle brightness suffers like all do. It’s not red dot bright. At high noon in Florida, I can barely make out the illumination. SFP LPVOSs tend to handle illumination a bit better, but LPVOs generally just can’t compete with red dots regardless of the money you spend.

Strutting Back

Things get a lot better when we walk back to 200 yards and start to invoke magnification. From 3x to 6x, the Warhorse shines. It’s super clear and very crisp, and it tends to have a bit of a warm look to it. I can easily see a wide variety of colors and make out my targets against various backgrounds.

Hitting targets isn’t a problem. I love this reticle. The Dragoon, as they call it, provides a nice little aiming dot that’s precise and easy to use. At 200 yards, I hit a ten-inch gong consistently if I took my time. The center dot didn’t obscure the target by any means.

The field of view is 18.32 feet at 100 yards at 6x magnification. That’s not exceptional, but it’s pretty good, and the obscure view makes it easy to observe and find targets. I would love to see it be just a hair wider, but for the money, I won’t complain too loudly about it.

The Warhorse most certainly shines when magnified, reinforcing my idea to use an offset red dot alongside the 1-6x LPVO.

The Setup

The Warhorse, Justice, and Hostile Engagement setup delivers an excellent LPVO setup. It’s a bit hefty at two pounds altogether, but very capable. If you’re like me and are curious about LPVOs, it’s a great way to dip your toe into the world. You’re getting a high-quality setup that won’t completely drain your wallet. The Warhorse might not satisfy optics snobs, but for the everyday user, it’s a fantastic value and a very capable option.

The post The Swampfox Warhorse LPVO: The Best Beginner LPVO appeared first on The Mag Life.

I’m one of those guys who wants an optic, light, or some type of accessory on just about every rifle I buy. When I find a good deal on a cheaper rifle, I don’t really want to spend hundreds on an optic. It’s okay, in my opinion, to have a variety of optics for different purposes. Let’s see how these two stack up against each other and determine if they are even worth the money.

ATI Duo Sight

I first encountered the ATI Duo Sight through a combo sale with an ATI rifle. Admittedly, it was my first experience with an ATI optic. ATI, or American Tactical Imports, is known for its affordable firearms and accessories, making them popular among budget-conscious shooters. I was interested in trying out their polymer AR-15 and the optic that came with it. While I wasn’t really looking for an optic, a cheaper optic for a cheaper AR wasn’t a bad idea.

The Duo Sight is their entry-level optic aimed at providing an affordable yet functional solution for casual shooting. It has a straightforward design and both red and green dot options. Further, it features a 4 MOA dot, which is adequate for most plinking and home defense scenarios.

I found the Duo Sight adequate for short- to mid-range shooting with the ATI rifle. The green reticle is surprisingly clear, and there are three different radical styles to choose from.

The battery sits inside the dial, which turns the optic on and adjusts the brightness. This design isn’t great because it makes it hard to get the battery lid on and off. When you try to tighten the lid, the entire on/off knob turns instead. A lever located on the back of the optic allows you to switch from one style of reticle to another.

ATI Duo Sight Specifications:

• Reticle: Red/Green Dot
• Dot Size: 4 MOA
• Adjustment: Windage and elevation
• Construction: Aluminum
• Mount: 1913 Picatinny rail
• Battery: CR2032
• Battery Life: Approx. 500 hours (manufacturer’s claim)
• Weight: 7.8 oz
• Length: 3.1 in

Truglo Tru-Brite

The Truglo Tru-Brite has been in my arsenal for about three years now. I’ve used it on several AR-15 rifles and a semi-auto shotgun. While I wouldn’t rely on it for a battle gun, it has held up okay so far. Truglo makes a lot of low-priced gear, but I’ve been surprised at their quality for what you pay.

The Tru-Brite offers both red and green dot reticles, similar to the ATI Duo Sight. Its 5 MOA dot is slightly larger, but there is only one style of reticle, which is a simple dot design.

The optic is constructed from lightweight aluminum and fits securely on a 1913 Picatinny rail. No tools are needed to attach the optic to a rail, which is a nice touch. Like the ATI, the Tru-Brite runs on a 2032 battery, and its location is also inside the control/power dial. While the ATI control dial is on top of the optic, the Truglo dial is on the side. This makes it easier to use when mounted on the rifle.

In use, the Tru-Brite has held up well to recoil and regular handling. The dot brightness is okay, and the color options are a nice addition. While red is the most popular color, I kind of like green dots. They’re easier to see, especially in daylight environments.

Truglo Tru-Brite Specifications:

• Reticle: Red/Green Dot
• Dot Size: 5 MOA
• Adjustment: Windage and elevation
• Construction: Aluminum
• Mount: 1913 Picatinny rail
• Battery: CR2032
• Battery Life: Approx. 1,000 hours (manufacturer’s claim)
• Weight: 7.8 oz
• Length: 3.8 in

How do they compare?

Both the ATI Duo Sight and Truglo Tru-Brite are entry-level optics designed for budget-conscious shooters. They share several similarities, including red and green dot settings and how the battery is installed. They are both compact optics and retail for about $50.

Because of its design, the Truglo appears to be a little more durable when it comes to the amount of aluminum around the frame. However, I have noticed that the control/power dial on the Truglo feels loose. It’s been this way since I’ve owned it, and it still works fine, so I’m not sure if all models are like this or just mine.

In terms of battery life, the Tru-Brite does a little better than the Duo Sight, with a manufacturer’s claim of approximately 1,000 hours compared to the Duo Sight’s 500 hours. Both optics use the CR2032 battery, a common and easily replaceable power source.

The brightness adjustment on both optics offers multiple settings, but the Tru-Brite provides a bit more flexibility, despite the slightly loose-feeling knob. This could be a deciding factor for those who shoot in varying lighting conditions.

Regarding reticles, the Duo Sight offers multiple reticles, including a standard dot and circle. The Tru-Brite uses only a traditional dot reticle. Both optics performed well out to 100 yards, but I couldn’t keep them zeroed in beyond that.

A good deal for the price?

Both the ATI Duo Sight and Truglo Tru-Brite appear to be of decent quality in terms of their price point. They are suitable for plinking, home defense, and casual shooting. I will mention that neither one has an auto-on feature, which is something I like for home defense.

While neither would be my first choice for a battle gun, they provide reliable, budget-friendly options for those who don’t want to break the bank on optics. If you want a low-cost optic that you’d find on an entry-level AR, I think either one of these optics would work just fine.

There are things I like and don’t like about each one, but the price makes those complaints irrelevant to me. For $50, I don’t think you will find a better optic for your AR-15.

The post Fifty-Dollar Optics: ATI Duo Sight vs Truglo Tru-Brite appeared first on The Mag Life.

The Viridian RFX15

The Viridian RFX15 is the company’s flagship open-emitter 3 MOA green dot sight. It features 6061 T6 anodized aluminum construction with an optical window measuring 17mmx24mm. It is set up to fit pistols milled for a Shield Arms footprint but comes equipped with an aluminum Picatinny mount for attaching to rails. The RFX15 also comes with brightness setting buttons: one to increase brightness on the left side and one to decrease it on the right. In total, it has eight brightness settings, including two settings for viewing with night vision devices.

Elevation and windage adjustments at the rear of the optic are also moveable via one of three hex and Allen keys. One is used to drive the included installation bolts, one is clamped down the Picatinny rail, and the other is for zeroing the optic. 

The RFX15 has a waterproof rating of IPX6 and weighs 0.7 ounces with a CR2032 battery. On a middle brightness setting, Viridian rates the battery life at 30,000+ hours, which is extended by automatic shutoff and Instant-On features. The RFX15 is available with your choice of either a black or FDE anodized finish and ships with a lens cleaning cloth and a rubber dust cover. It has an MSRP of $289.

The Viridian RFX11

It is useful to think of the Viridian RFX11 as a thermo-molded polymer version of the RFX15. It features the same 3 MOA dot, the same advertised 30,000-hour battery life, and the same automatic on/off settings. The major difference, as stated, is that it features a polymer frame.

The RFX11’s dot is not manually adjustable, and the optic relies on an ambient light sensor to tailor the dot’s brightness to the environment. It also has a slightly smaller viewing window of 16x22mm and has a flat top where the adjustment turrets are located. Like the RFX15, the RFX11 is set up for a Shield footprint pistol but comes with the same aluminum Picatinny rail base.

The RFX11 comes with the same installation equipment and accessories as the RFX15, including the adjustment keys, bolts, cleaning cloth, and dust cover. It has an IPX4 waterproof rating and uses a CR2032 battery. This optic ranks amongst the lightest optics on the market, weighing 0.5 ounces with the battery installed. Because of its lighter construction and minimalistic design, it has an MSRP of $209.

The Viridian RFX11 and RFX15 Compared

Each green dot model has its pros and cons. The RFX11 is the winner in the weight category and has the virtue of having a sensor-controlled brightness setting. However, perception varies from person to person and light to light. Although the sensor will most likely pick the right setting, for some shooters under certain shooting conditions, it might not be the appropriate setting.

The polymer housing is also more elastic than aluminum, and some shooters might have durability concerns and perhaps even fitment concerns with the milled aluminum or steel slides of an automatic pistol.

The RFX15 has a superior rating in the waterproof department and, of course, features durable aluminum construction. You are free to adjust the brightness to your liking, although it might wake up to a setting that you will have to readjust later on as there is no setting memory feature.  

Both pistols feature the same on/off arrangement with an automatic shutoff that is advertised to start after two minutes of inactivity. In my own testing of both optics, the emitter shut off after five minutes. Both also require the user to dismount the optic to change batteries, which can lead to some concerns about the optics losing their zero. Although the RFX11 is more budget-friendly, both optics are reasonably priced. Although the RFX15 is more durable, the RFX11 is “smarter.”

In the Field with the Viridian RFX Green Dots

I tested both optics across three firearms, and over 1,000 rounds fired downrange to determine which is better and whether their quirks are material concerns. I started by mounting the RFX15 on a Rainier Arms Dusk 19R, an upgraded Glock 19.

That particular pistol is cut for an RMR footprint, but with the help of a Rival Arms adapter plate, I had the RFX15 mounted in a few minutes. Viridian does provide enough bolt options to successfully use an adapter plate, should you need one—a smart move for people unaccustomed to pistol optics. You know, people like me. 

Zeroing the Optic

Sighting the optic was a bit touch-and-go. With the adapter plate, the optic was still high enough to achieve a good co-witness with the higher-profile sights on the Dusk 19R. From the bench, I simply flicked the brightness adjustment setting to compensate for the shade of my position and the glare on paper and let loose.

After a few shots downrange, I moved the dot to my intended aiming point. It does visually move as you twist the key from left to right or up and down. I still didn’t hit the point of aim. My inexperience quickly came up with a solution. I moved the dot from my intended point of aim to where my bullets originally struck, and success!

In under 5 minutes, I was zeroed at 10 yards. I repeated the same process with the RFX11 on its initial outing on a Savage A22 takedown rifle. The light sensor did a good job picking the right setting, and I was on target in no time. 

In a 350-round battery firing over several weeks, the RFX15 performed flawlessly on the Dusk 19R. The Loctite-coated screws never backed out, and all the brightness settings worked as expected. The 3 MOA dot was a good compromise between instant visibility and accuracy, as a larger dot that is more visible may not be so good at printing tight groups up close or obscuring larger targets at farther distances.

Although the dot did not improve my shooting from 7-15 yards, it did help me get repeatable and quick hits at 25-50 yards compared to using the iron sights alone. 

Durability Tests

I expected more trouble from the RFX11 because of its lighter construction. Admittedly, I started it out on a .22 rifle because I believed I might damage the optic if put on anything heavier. I found it a compelling light optic that one might use on a .22 rifle for closer shots. It went through a 300-round battery of testing with no issues. The light sensor also made quick work of extremely dim thunderstorm light and extremely sunny cloudless light, adjusting the brightness smartly.

To up the ante, I mounted it onto an Arex Delta Gen. 2 pistol chambered in 9mm and subjected the optic to some more abuse. Nothing happened. 

I subjected both optics to an eight-hour range day of moderate rain to satisfy my curiosity. Water got into the viewing windows, and despite having multicoated lenses, they fogged up when I went into the shelter. However, both optics cleared up, and their dots were not affected throughout that day or in the time since. My usual range days consisting of upper 90-degree temperatures and near 100% humidity didn’t hurt them either. 

The biggest flaw I found in both designs is the potential to lose zero, as the optic has to be removed from the Picatinny mount or the pistol slide for a battery change. Both optics are cut to fit securely around the locking nubs of a Shield footprint and secured via two bolts to a Picatinny mount.

Assuming everything is torqued down correctly, there should not be a loss of zero. But there is always that possibility. So that is what I did. I did not have a torque wrench to get my bolts tightened to the exact spec, so I had to settle for a snug fit using the included keys. To my surprise, both optics preserved their zeroes. I did lose zero going from the rifle to a pistol with the RFX11, but that was to be expected. 

The Viridian RFX Series: A Good Buy?

The world of reflex sights can be a frustrating one to conquer if you are just starting out. You have to know what each optics footprint is, what optics fit which footprint, and which adapter plates to get if necessary. There is also an ever-expanding portfolio of features out there, from Shake-Wake, auto-shutoff, auto-brightness, and even solar power capability.

There are also closed and open emitter types to contend with. Viridian is expanding its line to include the latest advancements. The RFX11 and RFX15 optics represent something of a generation that has already passed on an accessory that barely existed five years ago. Like those first optics, these early RFX models require dismounting for a battery change, while some later models have a port on the side so the optic stays mounted.

Although I did not have an issue, I do appreciate the concern. I found the RFX dots to be more feature-filled and useable than other first-gen-like optics. Holistically, the Viridian RFX11 and RFX15 exceed expectations beyond their price points.

The post Easy on the Eyes: Viridian RFX11 and RFX15 Green Dot Sights appeared first on The Mag Life.

Despite many purpose-built rifle and handgun red dot sights, ghost ring, notch-and-post, and rib-and-bead sights remain standard for shotguns. In most instances, a red dot on a shotgun meant adapting a rifle or pistol red dot to scattergun applications. However, the new Aimpoint ACRO S-2 introduces us to a dedicated shotgun red dot sight unlike any before it. Here’s why the ACRO S-2 marks the beginning of a new generation of dedicated shotgun red dot sights.

The Aimpoint ACRO Series

After half a century, Aimpoint requires little to no introduction. Aimpoint introduced the first true red dot sight, the “Electronic,” in 1974. Since then, Aimpoint continued to advance red dot technology and remains a leader in their field. Personally, I’ve employed several Aimpoint models in a professional role for well over a decade. Most recently, the Aimpoint ACRO P-2 made its way onto my duty handgun as the latest addition. Introduced in 2021, the P-2 is the ACRO line’s next generation of fully enclosed emitter handgun red dot sights. While its perceived size led to the nickname “the mailbox,” the ACRO’s weight (2.2 ounces) shows it’s anything but bulky or heavy.

Furthermore, the ACRO’s proprietary mounting design eliminated a common failure point amongst many other handgun optic mounting designs. With only a couple of months on the ACRO P-2, it’s hard to justify why I didn’t go to the mailbox sooner.

While doable on a fighting shotgun, most shotgun stocks are designed to place the shooter’s head in line with the top of the receiver, rib, and front bead. With an elevated red dot, the shooter’s head lifts off the stock, causing an inconsistent sight picture. In short, you want the optic mounted in line with the sights or as low as possible. From this need, the Aimpoint ACRO S-2 appeared as a first-of-its-kind dedicated shotgun red dot sight.

ACRO S-2 Mounting System

The Aimpoint ACRO S-2 features a completely redesigned mounting system from previous ACRO models. While the original ACRO’s mounting system was geared towards attachment to a pistol, the ACRO S-2 attaches to the shotgun rib. According to Aimpoint’s literature, the “height of optical axis” is 15mm “measured from top of mechanical surface.” In plain language, it’s 0.6 inches from the center of the sighting window to the top of the shotgun rib. After nearly two decades of testing and training with different iron, magnified, and red dot sights across various firearms, the ACRO S-2 is undoubtedly the easiest transition I’ve ever made to a new sight setup. If seeking a one-word description, “intuitive” immediately comes to mind.

After 100 rounds of 12-gauge bird shot, the sight drifted noticeably forward on the rib. After a small adjustment and quick tightening of the screw, it’s held in place ever since. Shotgun recoil is unforgiving, and, like any gear, I strongly recommend checking the mounting screw to ensure it hasn’t changed torque between firing sessions.

Shooting with the ACRO S-2

While the ACRO S-2 didn’t attend any bird hunts, it received a treatment of clays and steel target work. The reticle’s low profile produced a consistent and easy-to-find sight picture across several shotgun setups. With some red dots, the reticle easily drifts out of view. For the ACRO S-2, losing the reticle became a challenge. After handing the shotgun and optic combination off to several shooters of varying skill levels, I received universal positive feedback on the S-2’s intuitive and natural aiming presentation and profile. Unlike many aftermarket red dot sights, the ACRO S-2 feels like a natural extension of — and improvement over — traditional rib-and-bead sighting systems.

Even at its highest setting, the S-2’s reticle remained crisp, clear, and visible against bright backgrounds. Of course, the S-2 retains Aimpoint’s reputation for extremely long battery life. While environmental conditions and brightness settings factor into performance, experience tells me to expect a year or more of reliable use out of a single CR2032 battery.

The Aimpoint ACRO S-2 and the Future of Shotgun Red Dots

I’ve always been an admittedly strong proponent of Aimpoint’s products. After years behind rifles outfitted with a T-1 or PRO, Aimpoint proved their durability and effectiveness enough for me to recently acquire an ACRO P-2. With the ACRO S-2, Aimpoint rounded out their collection of purpose-built red dot sights with a fantastic addition.

While early in the game, I think the S-2 could change the conversation surrounding the practicality of red dots on shotguns. The ACRO S-2 is currently offered on GunMag Warehouse for $755.99. If you’re looking for a red dot sight designed for sporting, recreation, competition, or even tactical shotgun applications, the S-2 is money well spent.

The post Aimpoint ACRO S-2: The Shotgun Sight Reinvented appeared first on The Mag Life.

The ROMEO5 is a step above the MSR series but isn’t quite up there with the ROMEO4 or ROMEO8. The ROMEO5 famously retails for less than $200 and consistently performs well above its price point. They are my favorite budget optics and are the options I suggest to new gun owners just looking for a simple optical option.

Sig Sauer recently quietly released a Gen 2 to the famed ROMEO5 series. As an owner of more than one ROMEO5, I was excited to see how the new generation of ROMEO5s compared to the older generation. Let’s dig in and see if the ROMEO5 Gen 2 should replace all the Gen 1s on your guns.

A Common Denominator

The differences between the Gen 1 and Gen 2 ROMEO5s aren’t massive. They are both compact optics that are roughly the same size as the Aimpoint micro-optics. This size has dominated the red dot market and is essentially the standard. The optics are both 20mm red dots designed for long guns.

Both optics feature proprietary MOTAC technology, which automatically powers down the unit if left alone and idle for 120 seconds. When the optic senses motion, it springs back to life at the last brightness level. It’s a nice hands-free feature, for sure. Both optics have a standard 2 MOA dot option, although there are additional reticles for Gen 1.

When it comes to practical application, the average shooter isn’t going to notice a big difference between the two optics. You’ll be able to zero the optics easily, get them on target, and they’ll last a long time as long as you don’t take a hammer to them.

That doesn’t mean they are a perfect 1:1 comparison, and the Gen 2 upgrades shouldn’t be considered. The slight differences and variances can create seemingly big differences for users who might be pickier about their optics selection.

Gen 1 vs Gen 2

As a man who owns three ROMEO5 Gen 1 optics, I know the optic inside and out. The Gen 2 is still new to me, but it has proven impressive. Comparing the two, it seems like Sig Sauer doesn’t intend to replace the Gen 1s just yet but simply wants to provide a different option for more selective shooters with the Gen 2.

Models and Options

Right off the bat, the ROMEO5 Gen 1 has way more model options. It has the standard model, the XDR, the Predator, and a few dealer-specific models, like the OPMOD variant and the Tread model. Sig Sauer has spread the ROMEO5 around like America spreads democracy. It can be tough to make a one-for-one comparison, so I’ll focus on the standard ROMEO5 Gen 1 and the XDR when comparing it to Gen 2.

Mounting Differences

One of the biggest differences is the mounts. Sig Sauer built the ROMEO5 Gen 2 to be a one-piece design. The optic and mount are one solid piece of metal. The Gen 2 design replicates the XDR series of ROMEO5 red dots. The standard ROMEO5 Gen 1 uses an Aimpoint Micro footprint.

The standard Gen 1 allows the user to quickly alternate the height by using different mounts. Shooters can choose between various low and high mounts, making it easy to mount the optic on ARs, AKs, Scorpions, and more.

Changing heights is quite nice, especially if you use something other than an AR-based weapon or for night vision use. The original ROMEO5 can also be used as an offset or backup optic to a magnified optic.

The benefit of the Gen 2 optic is durability. One solid optic introduces fewer failure points, and it’s simply not reliant on small screws for staying tight on the gun. The ROMEO5 Gen 2 uses a huge nut and bolt that acts like a third recoil boss. This nut and bolt is much larger than the standard ROMEO5 and XDR size.

The design allows you to torque it down to 65-inch pounds. Sig’s design provides a massive clamping surface, and the optic locks down on your weapon. Removing it, or even breaking it loose, requires a significant amount of effort so it won’t easily lose zero or loosen up over time.

Turrets

The Gen 2 turrets also follow the XDR design. They are slightly recessed into the optic’s body and use a flat-head tool. Unlike the Gen 1, there are no capped turrets, but they aren’t needed. Operationally, the only difference is that Sig kicked up the tactile feel of the turrets with the Gen 2. The Gen 1 turrets are fine, but the Gen 2 provides much more tactile and audible feedback.

Buttons

There are some button differences. Both generations use top-mounted, ambidextrous buttons. The differences are slight. Gen 2 provides more feedback per press, and it’s easy to feel and engage with. The Gen 1 buttons are slightly more recessed and require more effort to press and activate.

Clarity

The Gen 2 delivers slightly better clarity. The notch filter is less aggressive, and the glass is clearer with the Gen 2. The Gen 1 features a slightly darker notch filter that gives the optic that blue tint.

The Gen 2 series uses a bottom-mounted battery compared to the Gen 1’s side-mounted battery compartment. This creates less obstruction in your two-eyed, open-sight picture. It’s small but worthwhile. The Gen 1 ROMEO5 XDR series uses the same type of bottom-mounted battery.

Battery

The Gen 2 uses a AAA battery with 50,000 hours of battery life, while the ROMEO5 uses a CR2032 battery with only 40,000 hours of battery life. The XDR series can also use a AAA battery with the same battery life—a small but notable difference worth noting.

Performance Differences

We don’t see a big difference between the two optics in action. One isn’t drastically better than the other. The Gen 2 has two additional daylight brightness settings, but I only use setting eight, even in the brightest light. The 2 MOA dots appear identical without a big difference in emitter clarity.

I’ve used the optics in varying light conditions and detected no noticeable difference. This includes bright daylight, dusk, early morning, and under-white mounted weapon lights. I even viewed both through an NVG monocular, and neither is that great under NVGs, but it’s not unusable either. Both optics maintained zero after several drops and feature IPX7 waterproof ratings.

As much as I’d love to say the Gen 2 is revolutionary, it’s just a microevolution of the Gen 1. The Gen 1 already offered a downright excellent optic, and there wasn’t much to change. These days, a basic Gen 1 can be found for around $130 for the base model. The XDR seems to sell for closer to $200. The Gen 2 falls right in the middle at around $160.

Which One?

If you want a more modular optic, the SIG ROMEO5 Gen 1 allows you to pick various mount heights, which allows it to work on guns outside of ARs or in backup optic roles. The Gen 2 gives us a more durable optic with a piece mount for less money than the Gen 1 XDR, but with only one reticle. This is why I don’t think the Gen 1s are being replaced just yet. The XDR series seems to be replaced with a slightly cheaper but better-made option.

Which would you pick? Let us know below!

The post Sig Sauer ROMEO5 Gen 1 vs Gen 2: A Comparison appeared first on The Mag Life.

I popped it open, took it out of the box, and took a peek through. I was a bit thrown off my rocker. It was such a clear image. I knew pretty much right away that most of what I knew about spotting scopes was completely wrong. I knew it was time to learn a thing or two about the art of spotting scopes and give the Vortex Viper a run for its money.

Specifications and Features

The Vortex Viper offers 11-33X variable magnification right off the bat. It’s designed to offer users a lightweight, compact spotting scope. Plenty of hardcore hunters aren’t sitting in their trucks drinking coffee while their dogs do all the work. A spotting scope like this can fit in the top of your pack with a small tripod with ease.

The Viper 11-33X weighs 27.8 ounces and is 10.3 inches long. It’s not a great big thing by any means. The optic has a 50mm objective lens diameter, so the 33X setting can still provide a good, bright image to the end user. The eye relief is short, but you expect that from a spotting scope. It’s 16 to 19mms. At 11X, the field of view is 182 feet at 1000 yards. At 33X, it shrinks to 95 feet at 1000 yards.

The Viper comes with an HD optical System, XR Plus lens coatings, and dielectric prism coatings. All of these aim to provide a clear and bright image with excellent color. The Viper isn’t a sissy, either. It has an Armortek coating to protect the lenses and a rubberized armored body, and it’s built to resist the elements.

The Vortex Viper comes with tethered lens covers, a lens cloth, and a neoprene case for extra protection.

In the Field With The Viper

The Viper’s 11-33x50X magnification feels like a ton to me. In reality, it’s not all that powerful. Even compared to options from Vortex that include 2-60x85X, the Viper seems to be on the lower edge of the magnification range. I’d argue that magnification should match the environment. Most folks might be quick to say they have too little magnification, but I think too much magnification can be a problem.

In the northwest corner of Florida, the closest thing we have to a wide open plain is the Gulf Of Mexico. Our forests and swamps are dense and chock full of vegetation. We have palmettos, kudzu, vines, and trees of all sorts. Here, a 200-yard shot might as well be a mile. There is no benefit to lugging a 60-ounce spotting scope with 20-60X magnification.

The Vortex Viper spotting scope played well with the local area. It allows the user to see at distances exceeding a quarter mile easily. Even at a half mile, which is nearly a thousand yards, I could see street signs, tell you their color and, in most cases, what they indicated. A clearing in my area has grown up over the spring and summer to a waist-high thicket. It’s become home to a flock of turkeys.

The Viper and I have enjoyed watching the flock move through the growing thicket. The spotting scope makes it easy to find their bobbing heads and bodies through the soon-to-be dense brush. Even when the brush exceeded their height, I could still track them as they waddled and made the brush move.

Establishing Zeroes

The day I received the optic, I had some family in town, and they had rifles to zero. We plugged the targets at 50 yards and loaded the spotting scope on a tripod. It became super handy to have a spotter call out adjustments. It saved us a lot of walking, and we were on target quickly.

Because we are talking about a visual implement, I think we should mention it was after dinner. It was not quite dark, and the sun stuck around longer than it was welcome—it often does in Florida summers. However, the light had dimmed to the point where muzzle flashes were visible, and the sky was painted pink.

In this dim environment, the Vortex Viper spotting scope still gave us a clear visual of holes in a target. To be completely fair, the holes were .450 Bushmaster holes, so they were quite large, but they were also on a blue target, which was less contrast than your typical white target.

Looking through the Vortex Viper made it feel like the sun was higher in the sky. The sight picture was bright and clear. The 50mm objective lens worked hard to gather light and provide that nice, clear image.

The only thing that changed from 50 to 200 yards where we confirmed the gun was the magnification. I had to dial it up and adjust the focus slightly, and that clear image was reflected once more. The big .45 caliber holes were easy to see even at 200 yards, and we confirmed the zero without needing to walk back and forth up and down the range. I saved time, but my FitBit didn’t care for the lost steps.

It’s the Little Things

A few little things make using the Vortex Viper such a blast. It’s the little things that make a difference. For one, the dual adjust focus design. The knob allows for slight and broad adjustments. This makes it easy to get a clear picture when you go from 50 to 200 yards or beyond.

The magnification ring is ultra-smooth and easy to manipulate. That’s not just nice to have but downright necessary at longer ranges. As you increase the magnification, every little movement your hands make becomes fairly broad in the spotting scope. Smooth magnification manipulations allow you to find the subject at 11X and zoom in to 33X without coming off target.

The bikini lens covers keep things protected, and the included sock makes travel easy. Setup and takedown from a tripod is no hassle at all. It’s smooth and easy to use. I’m a complete novice when it comes to spotting scopes, but I very much enjoyed my time with the Vortex Viper.

Not only did it deliver crystal-clear, bright, high-definition images, but it was also easy to use. It’s lightweight, so it can be packed in and out with minimal drama. The price isn’t half bad, and the magnification range works quite well for most hunters, shooters, and birders.

The post A Review of The New Vortex Viper HD 11-33×50 Spotting Scope appeared first on The Mag Life.

The TruGlo Triton, which currently sells for $119.90 on GMW, seems to have a lot of features and options for less than $150. That price may be a good deal, but is it too good to be true? What gun is the TruGlo Triton good for? How much abuse can it withstand? Prejudices aside, let’s see where the TruGlo Triton fits — good, cheap, or both.

TruGlo Triton Tri-Color Dot Sight

While its name isn’t much, for brevity’s sake, the TruGlo Triton Tri-Color Dot Sight looks like any other traditional red dot optic. The Triton is a 30mm unmagnified tube with a single 5 MOA dot electronic reticle. The reticle features three color choices (red, blue, and green) with four brightness settings (off, 1, 2, and 3) for each color.

The TruGlo Triton includes a cantilever mount compatible with Picatinny and Weaver-style bases. The mount secures with two Allen screws, and the mounting height is about perfect for a lower-third co-witness with most AR sights. Mounting was quick and easy out of the box. I appreciated TruGlo including a tag on the Allen screws to not torque them past 20-ft-lbs with the supplied Allen wrench. I imagine they’ve had a few customers over-torque a base a time or two.

I can talk about the TruGlo Triton’s features and specs all day long, but anyone can find that with a quick Google search. Let’s get into the testing — and abuse — of this little red dot optic.

In the Field and on the Range with the TruGlo Triton

When I started planning what to do with the TruGlo Triton, I decided to focus on practical testing. Okay, maybe some of the testing ventured into the extreme. Nonetheless, the core tests focused on the durability, practicality, and functionality of the TruGlo Triton. How does the Triton hold up to recoil? Can the Triton withstand moisture exposure? The testing ultimately answered these questions and then some.

Sighting-in the TruGlo Triton

It’s hard to review an optic without using it. Once mounted up, it was time for sight-in. As mentioned earlier, the optic settings don’t provide the greatest range of adjustment, and the dot didn’t quite have the precision adjustment I’m accustomed to. Speaking of the dot, I noticed some distortion in the dot’s window that caused additional reflection from the optic’s diode. While not awful, the additional reflection distracted the eye during precision shots.

Shooting — a lot

I have a lot of irons in the fire at any given time and try to make efficient use of my time. Coincidentally, I was in the middle of testing Slip2000’s EWL30 weapon lubricant with a 300-round test of EWL30 against another lubricant. With 600 rounds on the menu, it seemed a good time to take the TruGlo Triton for a spin on a full-auto M16. After all, 600 rounds of sustained automatic weapons fire are bound to put an optic through a little trauma.

After the first 300 rounds, the rear rubber sight cover became the first casualty, as the cross pin ejected and disappeared into the abyss of range gravel and spent brass. Despite that minor inconvenience, the optic retained zero. During later testing, I discovered TruGlo’s cantilever scope ring had worked loose and wasn’t as tight as it should have been. On my part, I should have checked it before and during shooting. Regardless, the optic surprisingly retained zero at 25 yards.

TruGlo Triton Drop Test

Not all optics are made the same. When paying for a higher-end optic, you’re getting more than just features or clearer glass. The biggest feature with higher-priced optics is often unseen: durability. For over a decade, I’ve held the Aimpoint T1 near and dear to my heart. It’s been dropped and banged around on the range, in a patrol car, and during professional use. On one occasion, it rested on the trunk of a car during a range trip and took a brief ride on the deck lid before the optic landed directly on the range gravel. The Aimpoint retained zero and escaped further trauma with only some minor scratches. With the TruGlo Triton, durability was definitely a concern. Will the Triton hold up to such abuse?

Drop testing the Triton wasn’t extravagant. With the optic mounted on a lightweight, budget-built AR-15, I dropped the rifle three times from waist height (around 42 inches) with the optic falling directly on concrete. The first hit put a dent in the objective lens, while the second didn’t seem to do much. The third drop, however, took a toll on the Triton.

The Water Test

Despite recent dirt work, my range still likes to turn into a small pond for critters during the wetter months. After several inches of rain, the murky water seemed to be an appropriate testing site for the TruGlo Triton. As a matter of note, no tadpoles were harmed during this testing.

Is the TruGlo Triton worth the money?

I’ve long said there’s no such thing as “good” or “bad” optics. Rather, an optic should be judged by its purpose and scope of application. While a $2,000 scope will provide incredible service for any end user, not all setups require such an expenditure. Would I put the TruGlo Triton on a home defense or patrol rifle? No. However, the Triton would certainly be at home on a budget range build in need of an optic or a .22 trainer setup.

The TruGlo Triton provides a convenient and economical setup for those looking to get an optic on their rifle, with little expense and few features. For $120, don’t expect this optic to hold up to heavy abuse from banging it around, inclement weather, or other adverse conditions. However, the Triton held up surprisingly well to extended periods of sustained recoil and never lost its zero. For a range, recreational, or even hunting optic, I have full confidence my shots would land wherever I put the dot. That’s definitely a win for the money. Just don’t do what I did to it.

The post TruGlo Triton: A Reliable $100 Optic? appeared first on The Mag Life.

I can’t say I mind, either. I have even moved on to the larger enclosed emitter optics like the Aimpoint ACRO and Steiner MPS. So, is there any room left for iron sights in today’s optic crowded world? Those who want a backup to their red dot tend to go with flip-up sights. There’s nothing wrong with those; I use them on some of my rifles. But today, we are going to talk specifically about fixed iron sights.

Flipping up some backup sights sounds easy. In fact, I never even thought about it because it’s nothing more than pushing a lever. But it’s not as easy as it sounds when your adrenaline is going, it’s dark, and you’re trying to focus on an armed suspect while you’re moving.

Are fixed iron sights the solution?

My first reaction after that night was to sort out why my optic failed. Was it the battery, a faulty optic, or what? But as I thought about it, I realized this was a problem that was inevitable to arise. If an optic uses a battery, it can and will eventually die. One of the biggest things that changed my mind was a training video I watched of a former Navy Seal who deployed numerous times overseas.

When I glanced at the video, I noticed he had fixed iron sights on his rifle, along with his EOTech optic. This got my attention right away because I was still trying to find the best solution to my incident. In the video, he went on to explain that he uses fixed iron sights with his optic so he can always stay on target. Even if an optic fails, there’s no need to stop and flip sights up; you just keep on taking care of business.

A third group uses fixed iron sights with their optics. Like anything else in the gun world, I’m a believer that there is no “one size fits all.” Most often, when I read about a subject with multiple viewpoints, I think they all probably work for some. So, this is not an argument for or against fixed or flip-up sights but simply something to consider.

Things to Consider

I like reading about tactics and ideas from other, more qualified people. If someone has been there and done that, why not listen to what they have to say, right? For years, my view of iron sights was that they are something old that has been replaced by something new. After hearing about others, mostly war veterans, who still use iron sights, I started paying more attention.

The most obvious reason for having a backup sighting system is having an optic fail. My battery was bad (I think), but other things can also go wrong. When you have fixed iron sights, you are already using them if your optic goes down. This removes that few-second delay of flipping up your backup sights and re-engaging.

For home defense, this is a good option as it ensures you always have some type of sight when you grab your rifle. Many red dot optics have auto-on features, but verifying your optic is on during an emergency isn’t feasible.

What types of sights work for you?

Some will say only front sights attached to the barrel are worth using, and others will use rail-mounted front sights. Again, everyone has their own opinion, and you have to find what works best for you. Because I like free-float barrels, I use front and rear sights that attach to the Picatinny rail. Midwest Industries, Samsom, Troy, and Daniel Defense make great fixed front and rear sights.

Another option I’ve seen people use is a fixed front sight with a rear flip-up sight. This still improves your accuracy if your dot goes out while shooting. Flipping up a rear sight is faster than flipping up both during an incident. When setting up your sighting system, consider all your options, try a few of them out, and go with what works best for you.

The post Fixed Iron Sights: Still Viable or Outdated? appeared first on The Mag Life.

I’ve got my hands on both and have decided to take them to the mats. Is one better than the other? Is there a big difference between two red dots made by the same company that are part of the same series? If there wasn’t, I wouldn’t write the article. I was pleasantly surprised by the differences between the two topics.

I originally reviewed the Defender-CCW shortly after it came out, and I wasn’t impressed. It was fine, but it had some serious weaknesses. When the ST came out, I expected more of the same but bigger. Before we dive into where the optics differ, let’s talk about what they have in common.

The ST and CCW – Brothers From Different Mothers

Both the ST and CCW are micro red dots designed for handguns. Both offer either a 3- or 6-MOA dot and use an exposed emitter design. Vortex went hard with this textured front design that encourages you (or at least me) to slam the front of the optic against tables to charge my pistol.

While the batteries differ, both optics see a top-loading battery. Vortex includes a metric ton of different screws with each optic and Glock MOS plates. This makes it easy to attach the optic to various handguns that use various screw lengths. Both optics even come with Picatinny rails. That’s what they have in common. So, where do they differ?

The Size Difference

As the name implies, the CCW is for CCW guns. It’s the smaller of the optics and uses a Shield RMSc footprint. The ST, or standard, is for larger guns and is a bigger option. The ST uses the Leupold DPP footprint and makes good use of this rather larger optic footprint. The bigger size allows for a bigger battery, and the ST uses the 2032 compared to the CCW’s 1632.

The CCW is 1.59 inches long and weighs less than an ounce. The ST measures 1.83 inches and weighs 1.48 ounces. The bigger ST comes with a bigger window. The ST window is 23 mm wide and 20 mm high, while the CCW window measures 20 mm wide and 16 mm high. This distinct difference separates the optics into entirely different categories.

Clarity

Vortex uses high-dispersion, high-clarity glass that delivers an impressive level of clarity. The view through both optics is quite nice. The notch filter, that blue tint you see in most red dots, is light. It’s not super dark or even all that noticeable unless you go looking for it.

In a vacuum, the dots don’t look all that different. You likely won’t notice a difference if you’re just looking through these two optics in a gunshop. However, the ST has a better higher refresh rate than the CCW. It’s very evident at lower brightness levels.

It’s even more evident when you start shooting. The CCW’s dot has distinct lag and spots instead of streaks. The ST is a noticeable improvement on the CCW.

The Battery

As noted, the ST uses the larger 2032 battery, which grants the optic up to 25,000 hours of use on a moderate setting. The ST also features a shake-awake auto-off function that shuts the optic off after it fails to sense movement for 10 minutes. The CCW uses a smaller 1632 battery and has a battery life of only 9,500 hours. It also has a shake-awake style auto-off system, but the optic doesn’t shut off for 14 hours.

The ST is a well-thought-out design. Vortex heard criticism of the CCW and designed the ST to avoid those same criticisms. I applaud them for learning from the CCW and fixing those issues.

At the Range

Once we hit the range, the differences between the two become even more obvious. Bigger is better at the range. A bigger window can forgive a poor presentation. Finding the dot with a bigger window is easier, especially for beginners. The bigger window is also easier to use if you are stuck in odd positions. It’s a minor difference, but it’s worth noting.

On a handgun, it’s less likely you’ll notice a big difference between window sizes. The window size becomes a bigger deal if you mount either dot as an offset on a long gun. Offset dots exist in an already awkwardly mounted position in most cases, and once you introduce cover to your shooting situation, every millimeter of window size helps.

The Defender-ST greatly improved the CCW by using a better emitter. The refresh rate difference is notable, and the ST doesn’t lag like the CCW. Drive the guns between different targets reveals the lag of the CCW. The ST features a faster refresh rate, and it’s not lagging or failing at lower brightness levels.

When I shoot the ST, it looks like a red streak that allows me to track my shots. When I shoot the Defender, it’s a series of dots rather than a bright red streak. There’s a night and day difference between the two optics. I can’t tell why they didn’t take this route in the first place.

Both optics will retain zero and can take a decent beating. That front texturing encourages you to use the optic as a charging handle, and you can drive the optic against a wall, table, or boot, and the optic can take it. Thick walls and a bulky design support the glass. The optics both function, but the ST has some advantages.

Price

Smaller optics should be cheaper, and the CCW has an MSRP of 349.99, while the ST has an MSRP of 469.99. MSPRs are one thing, and street price is another. You can purchase the ST for 329.99 and the CCW for 249.99. Both fall into the budget realm for red dots. I think the Defender-ST stands apart in the budget realm. It’s a solid budget buy. The Defender CCW faces more intense competition from optics like the Holosun 407K.

The Obvious

I think it’s obvious that my choice of optic is the Defender-ST. If I had to pick one of the two, it’d be the ST. The problem here is that these optics aren’t directly competing with one another. One is for a micro compact-style pistol, and the other is for a compact to full-sized gun.

That said, I would pick the Defender-ST as a budget optic for a handgun and endorse it wholeheartedly. What are your thoughts on the Vortex Defender series? Let us know below!

The post The Vortex Defender Series: ST vs CCW Comparison appeared first on The Mag Life.

However, LPVOs and other scopes tend to be larger and heavier, which is not ideal for every setup. Having a magnified optic that is smaller than some standard red dots is kind of cool. The Burris RT-3 has a red illumination to help you see the etched reticle, giving you the best of both worlds. Because it’s a 3X magnification, it has just enough power to increase your distance but still works up close as well.

If we are serving a search warrant on a residence in town, I use a standard red dot. But at times, we must approach suspects in rural areas, and something with magnification is helpful.

About the Burris RT-3

Saying this is a compact prism sight is an understatement. It’s about 3.5 inches long and weighs 8.8 ounces. The eye relief is 2.6 inches, and the field of view is 38-100 yards. The design of the Burris RT-3 is simple and easy to use. A side loading compartment houses the CR2032 battery. It’s sealed off well because I submerged it in water to find out.

Another method I use to do an impact test is to place the optic in the dryer. Our dryer has a large metal bin, and it really throws metal objects around quite nicely. The RT-3 made a lot of noise bouncing around in the dryer, but it was still running strong when I took it out.

Some of Burris’s other models have removable bases so that a riser can be added if you so desire. With the RT-3, you get a one-piece setup. The optic blends into the Picatinny rail with a cross-bolt mount. From the bottom of the mount to the middle of the lens is 1.5 inches. A Picatinny rail mount riser can still be used with this optic, but I like the distance as it is.

Operating the RT-3

Two buttons on the top of the optic increase or decrease the brightness settings of the illuminated reticle. Stadia lines and a center horseshoe make up the reticle. The elevation and windage lines are easy enough to see, especially when the reticle is turned on. Because the RT-3 has an etched reticle, you can use it without any power as well. This is perfect for home/self-defense.

Sighting in the RT-3 was easy, with the elevation and windage being 1 MOA per click. I mounted my RT-3 on a full-size AR for now, but I may move it to a shorter rifle down the road.

Burris RT-3 Range Testing

Once I zeroed the optic, I did some shooting at 25, 50, and 100 yards. Because it has an illuminated reticle, I wanted to run some speed shooting drills. The bright red horseshoe reticle made it easy to find the target quickly. My first drill was from the 25-yard line, and I fired five rounds from a low ready as fast as I could. All my rounds hit the A zone, so I was a happy camper.

A “Forever Warranty”

This is a perfect optic for those who want a compact optic with 3X magnification. Burris offers what they call a “Forever Warranty” that makes this prism scope even more appealing. If something goes wrong, Burris will repair or replace it at no charge with no receipt, and no questions asked. That is a bold promise to make and one that means something to me.

If you plan to spend hard-earned money, it’s refreshing to know the company guarantees you are buying a good product. The RT-3 retails for about $389.99 at most retail stores. The box includes a CR2032 battery, cleaning cloth, and lens.

All that said, I think the Burris RT-3 Mini-3X Prism Sight is an excellent entry-level optic for the home defense rig. It’s affordable and reliable, and while I wish there was an auto-on feature, the optic is rather accurate. It gets the job done and doesn’t break the bank. I’ll count that as a win.

The post Burris RT-3 Mini-3X Prism Sight: A Quick Review appeared first on The Mag Life.