{"id":435570,"date":"2024-09-16T09:00:55","date_gmt":"2024-09-16T14:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gunmagwarehouse.com\/blog\/?p=435570"},"modified":"2025-08-04T13:35:16","modified_gmt":"2025-08-04T18:35:16","slug":"underwood-ammo-xtreme-defender-not-your-dads-defense-ammo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunmagwarehouse.com\/blog\/underwood-ammo-xtreme-defender-not-your-dads-defense-ammo\/","title":{"rendered":"Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender: Not Your Dad\u2019s Defense Ammo"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bullets have come a long way over the last 70 years. From early lead wadcutters to modern bonded and monolithic hollow points, the once recognizable gap between handgun caliber performance has largely closed. For the most part, bonded hollow points and their variants have dominated the market over the last few decades. Underwood Ammo had other ideas in mind, though, when they partnered with Lehigh Defense to produce their Xtreme Defender line of fluid transfer monolithic (FTM) bullets.<\/p>\n

Compared to some companies with a century under their belt, Underwood Ammo is a relatively new entry in the ammunition market. Founded in 2013, Underwood Ammo\u2019s selection and brand recognition have exploded over the last decade. From hard cast to all-copper to traditional hollow point, they offer an impressive rifle and handgun ammo<\/a> selection. I finally approached them this year to learn more about their offerings \u2014 especially the Xtreme Defender line.<\/p>\n

Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme lineup includes three FTM projectile designs: the Defender, Penetrator, and Hunter. The Hunter and Penetrator lines offer superior penetration against otherwise resilient wild animals like hogs and bears. Meanwhile, the Defender line revolves around defense from bipedal predators.<\/p>\n

I ultimately decided to start out testing a few +P loads from their 9mm Xtreme Defender cartridge line. For this round, I compared the Xtreme Defender\u2019s terminal performance and load consistency to a couple of other established and proven defensive cartridges.<\/p>\n

Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender 9mm<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Fluid transfer monolithic (FTM) projectiles don\u2019t expand like traditional hollow points. Unfortunately, some traditionalists prejudicially dismiss them in favor of hollow points. Personally, I try to shy away from the collective hype at the next greatest thing, as well as dogmatic adherence to tradition. I\u2019d much rather borrow a page from Einstein and apply a \u201cpassionate curiosity\u201d towards the new and old.<\/p>\n

While I covered FTM projectile design and performance in detail in a previous article, it\u2019s worth a brief review for those unfamiliar with the mechanics of these projectiles. To start, \u201cmonolithic\u201d refers to the projectile\u2019s solid copper construction. \u201cFluid transfer\u201d refers to how the projectile produces terminal performance. Unlike traditional hollow point bullets, fluid transfer projectiles utilize the projectile\u2019s rotation to produce a permanent wound cavity.<\/p>\n

\"Underwood
Where traditional hollow points expand on impact (Far left: Federal HST; far right: Speer Gold Dot), FTM projectiles like Underwood’s Xtreme Defender line (middle two) don’t expand on impact. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme Defender bullets look like blunted Phillips head screwdriver tips. The 90-grain 9mm +P Xtreme Defender exits a Glock barrel<\/a> spinning around 60,000 revolutions per minute. When the flutes encounter a fluid medium like flesh or tissue, the bullet\u2019s velocity and rapid rotation compress the surrounding fluid and force it away from the projectile. Unlike hollow point bullets, the bullet doesn\u2019t expand or deform significantly when striking a barrier. As a result, FTM projectiles are often referred to as “barrier blind” because of their exceptional ability to overcome hard barriers and still produce reliable terminal performance. With such a radically different design, it\u2019s better to see the performance firsthand to believe it. Even better, let\u2019s compare it against several proven self-defense projectiles.<\/p>\n

The Contenders<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Over the years, several 9mm loadings have proven to be reliable defensive cartridges. With plenty to choose from, it\u2019s hard to narrow them down for comparison against Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme Defender line. While brevity isn’t my strong suit, I at least narrowed things down to a couple of popular law enforcement and personal defense cartridges.<\/p>\n

Speer Gold Dot 9mm 124-grain +P<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Speer Gold Dot<\/a> is a well-established defensive ammunition with a proven track record. The bonded lead core and copper jacket provide reliable and consistent expansion through barriers. Speer\u2019s advertised muzzle velocity sits at 1,220 feet per second (fps) from a 4-inch barrel, penetrating 11.78 inches of bare ballistic gelatin.<\/p>\n

Federal HST 9mm 124-grain +P<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Federal HST<\/a> is another proven performer that is widely used in law enforcement and personal defense. HST also features a bonded lead core with a copper jacket. With an advertised muzzle velocity of 1,260 fps, Federal states HST will penetrate 10 inches of bare ballistic gelatin.<\/p>\n

Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender 9mm 90-grain +P<\/strong><\/h3>\n

This offering from Underwood Ammo utilizes a non-expanding 90-grain solid copper projectile. Underwood pushes this round\u2019s lighter weight to an advertised velocity of 1,475 fps. The bullet design and high velocity achieve a reported 18 inches of penetration in bare ballistic gelatin with double the permanent wound cavity width of traditional hollow point cartridges.<\/p>\n

Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender 9mm 68-grain +P<\/strong><\/h3>\n

While some might expect less performance from a lighter cartridge, this 68-grain loading from Underwood Ammo reports similar performance as the 90-grain in bare ballistic gelatin. With an advertised velocity of a blistering 1,800 fps, Underwood claims this load generates less recoil without sacrificing performance.<\/p>\n

Bare Gelatin: Underwood Ammo vs Hollow Points<\/strong><\/h2>\n

This comparison focused on 9mm +P performance in bare ballistic gelatin between Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme Defender line, Speer Gold Dot, and Federal HST. Three shots of each cartridge were fired from 10 feet away into Knox ballistic gelatin blocks. The gelatin blocks were refrigerated at 39\u00b0 F and calibrated pursuant to FBI standards prior to testing. A ProChrono Digital chronograph obtained velocities directly in front of the gelatin blocks.<\/p>\n

While this test’s data is relatively succinct and straightforward, performing gelatin tests at home requires a lot of preparation, work, and review. As such, future articles will include FBI barrier penetration testing through mediums like steel, drywall, wood, and glass. For now, I kept testing relatively simple for this introduction to Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme Defender cartridge.<\/p>\n

Advertised vs Achieved Velocity<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Over the years, I\u2019ve come to expect manufacturer-advertised velocities won\u2019t always match those achieved at home. However, all but one of the tested cartridges exceeded the advertised velocities. The advertised velocities for most of these loadings were obtained from a 4-inch barrel. Since this test used a Glock 17 with a 4.5-inch barrel, it’s no surprise velocities were a little higher than advertised.<\/p>\n

\"Velocity
Advertised versus average velocities from three-shot test groups at 10 feet from the muzzle. All cartridges except Speer Gold Dot overperformed compared to manufacturer data. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>Underwood Ammo\u2019s loads overperformed consistently, with standard deviations around 10 and 4 fps for the 68 and 90-grain loads, respectively. Federal HST overperformed as well, with a standard deviation of 26 fps. Speer Gold Dot barely underperformed, with a standard deviation of 21 fps. Overall, I\u2019m cautiously suspicious of Speer’s underperforming results throughout this test. While the majority of tested loads were less than four years old, the Gold Dot used was over 12 years old. Even with proper storage, it\u2019s possible the ammunition’s age or another unknown factor caused the shortcomings (further examination is warranted at a later date). Otherwise, the tested cartridges all performed within 2% of their advertised velocity.<\/p>\n

Advertised vs Achieved Penetration<\/strong><\/h4>\n

I\u2019ll be the first to admit my ballistic gelatin setup isn\u2019t comparable to those backed by a seven-figure budget. Nonetheless, I follow FBI standards as closely as possible to maintain a consistent standard across all cartridges. During my early recipe development, the gelatin blocks were properly calibrated within FBI standards, and testing of Hornady Critical Duty and Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender almost perfectly mirrored advertised results in similar ballistic mediums. At a minimum, these results were obtained on a level playing field with the same conditions, gelatin composition, and calibration.<\/p>\n

\"Gelatin
While it goes much without saying, the Underwood Xtreme Defender produced significant penetration. However, as shown later, this didn’t negatively affect the resulting permanent wound channel in the slightest. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>Across the board, each of the tested loads performed well with consistent expansion. Unfortunately, Speer Gold Dot underperformed from its advertised depth by over two inches. For reasons discussed earlier, the ammunition\u2019s age may have played a part in its underperformance. Meanwhile, Federal HST outperformed advertised penetration depth by slightly over an inch. Underwood Ammo\u2019s Xtreme Defender 68 and 90-grain loadings consistently penetrated between 17 and 18 inches. Due to improper shot alignment, two 68-grain Xtreme Defender rounds exited the gelatin at around 16 inches.<\/p>\n

\"Underwood
Federal HST, the top hollow point performer in this testing batch, was dwarfed by the Xtreme Defender’s penetration depths and wound channel. Note: Due to lens distortion and camera angle, projectile depths on the scale may appear shorter than achieved. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>Overall, Underwood Ammo took the top spot in penetration depth. FBI guidelines require projectiles not to penetrate beyond 18 inches but no less than 12. The Xtreme Defender projectiles stopped right at or before those requirements. While penetration is important to defensive projectile performance, it\u2019s not the be-all and end-all. Ultimately, defensive cartridge performance rests upon it, transferring as much energy as possible into the target. As I\u2019ll explain below, the Underwood Ammo Xtreme Defender displayed impressive permanent wound channel performance well above and beyond proven hollow points.<\/p>\n
\"Underwood
Despite lower penetration, Speer Gold Dot still produced impressive wound channels. Comparatively, Underwood’s 68-grain Xtreme Defender load produced almost unbelievable permanent wound channels with nearly double Gold Dot’s penetration depth. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Permanent Wound Channel<\/strong><\/h4>\n

When a bullet hits an intended target, the projectile creates two types of wound cavities: temporary and permanent. Temporary wound channels appear spectacular with the aid of a slow-motion camera. However, the permanent wound channel (PWC), which represents lasting trauma from the projectile, is historically the more accurate measure of a cartridge’s mythical \u201cstopping power.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Underwood
With these images scaled against each other, all four cartridges produced respectable PWCs. However, Underwood Xtreme Defender (XD) PWCs produced greater maximum width and maintained a wider sustained width over greater distances. Without a doubt, Underwood’s performance was visually impressive and stunning. [Photo: Tom Stilson]<\/figcaption><\/figure>Overall, the tested cartridges produced respectable, consistent wound channels. However, when side-by-side, Underwood Xtreme Defender undeniably scored at the top. Federal and Speer produced maximum PWCs in excess of two inches. On the other hand, both the 90 and 68-grain Underwood loads produced maximum width PWCs exceeding three inches. Furthermore, Xtreme Defender ammunition<\/a> maintained PWC diameters of over two inches, which was far longer than HST and Gold Dot. In addition, the Xtreme Defender’s PWC volume still wins by a significant margin if measuring to the shortest penetration depth of all four tested cartridges.<\/p>\n

The Future of Defensive Projectiles<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Fluid transfer monolithic projectiles represent a radical paradigm shift in defensive cartridge design. While many gimmicky rounds have come and gone, Underwood\u2019s Xtreme Defender cartridge line has shown obvious performance advantages far from any kind of gimmick. I\u2019m genuinely excited to see how these rounds perform in later testing against barriers compared to traditional, proven hollow point cartridges. I have my educated conclusions, but I’d prefer to remain impartial until publishing the final results here.<\/p>\n

Underwood Xtreme Defender 9mm +P is competitively priced at around $1.25 per round. If you don\u2019t believe the performance I\u2019ve seen from these rounds, they\u2019re priced reasonably enough for you to grab a box and try some yourself. I have a feeling you\u2019ll be just as impressed as I was.
\n\t

\n
\n

Shop This Article<\/h2>\n <\/div>\n
\n