People are relatively easy to kill. That may be a comforting notion if you’re defending yourself in a legally, morally acceptable deadly force encounter. It’s anything but if you consider that you are people too — meaning you’re just as vulnerable, if not more so, than your opponent. The term tactical training means more than what people tend to think it means. In fact, just the word training should mean more than it so often does.It should certainly be more than a colloquial term for sitting in a classroom or just putting rounds downrange.
Here’s a question for you, and it’s not rhetorical. Isn’t any training that might affect your ability to successfully defend yourself by definition “tactical”?
If someone is serious about the carrying and potential use of a tool capable of taking someone’s life, that person should understand what training is and what it is not. Firearms-wise, for instance, it should be about more than just marksmanship and drawstrokes. It should be about when to “drag iron”, and when not too. It should be about test-firing your gear as much as it shooting your weapon. It should be about learning from your own mistakes (and achievements) as it is about other students’ mistakes and achievements.
And it should be about having fun.
Otherwise you may just be doing it wrong.
Hit the play button for further discussion. As always, hit us up in the comments below with comments, questions, concerns, and personal insight. The better the discussion, the greater than chance we all learn. Editor
Host: Daniel Shaw
Co-Host: Varg Freeborn
Introduction/Timeline: David Reeder